Let’s explore some information that should give you a sense that the analysis you’re doing of this novel is relevant and that it makes sense. I’m going to tell you a few facts, and then use those facts to make an argument about the dialogical nature of this text, and.
You’re going to hear a lot about a “dialogue with literature” and a “dialogue within literature” this year. If you want to either enjoy this class or do well in it, you’ll need to grasp this concept from the beginning. Let me first define dialogue by what it is NOT..
I’m sure this is no revelation to you, but nothing happens in a vacuum. You read this not as a neutral human being who exists outside the time-space continuum, but as a senior in high school, burdened consciously and unconsciously with all the accoutrements of senior-ness: new t-shirts, obstructed view.
The Post a Student Wrote in the Forum: Maybe we know that there is a power of sharing ideas and in our massive egos or our attention to the expectations and conventions of the world we live in, we obstruct the purity in our thoughts? Our thoughts are ghosts that we.
What I think I wanted to see is whether your default mindset was to listen objectively to what a difficult text says or to filter the details through your own biases and write your thinking about the text before you had listened to it. In other words, did you lay.